Korban Jiwa, Dugaan Pelanggaran BPJS hingga Indikasi Persekongkolan Tender Rp 97,9 Miliar
Medan – Kasus kecelakaan kerja yang menewaskan seorang pekerja di proyek Medan Islamic Centre membuka tabir persoalan serius dalam tata kelola proyek pemerintah. Dari dugaan pelanggaran kewajiban BPJS hingga indikasi persekongkolan tender bernilai Rp 97,9 miliar, proyek strategis milik Pemerintah Kota Medan ini kini berada di bawah sorotan publik dan berpotensi mengarah pada pelanggaran hukum administrasi hingga pidana.
Pembangunan Medan Islamic Centre (MIC) yang digadang sebagai ikon baru peradaban Islam di Sumatera Utara justru menyisakan tanda tanya besar. Proyek bernilai ratusan miliar rupiah tersebut tidak hanya menghadapi persoalan teknis, tetapi juga mulai diwarnai dugaan pelanggaran serius yang berpotensi menyeret pihak-pihak terkait ke ranah hukum.
Proyek yang dikelola oleh Dinas Perumahan, Kawasan Permukiman, Cipta Karya dan Tata Ruang (Perkimcikataru) Kota Medan ini menjadi sorotan setelah seorang pekerja bernama Wahyu Suprio meninggal dunia dalam kecelakaan kerja. Fakta yang mengemuka menunjukkan bahwa korban tidak terdaftar sebagai peserta BPJS Ketenagakerjaan, padahal hal tersebut merupakan kewajiban dasar dalam proyek konstruksi yang menggunakan anggaran negara.
Dalam konteks hukum, kondisi ini berpotensi melanggar Pasal 15 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2011 tentang BPJS, yang secara tegas menyatakan bahwa pemberi kerja wajib mendaftarkan pekerjanya dalam program jaminan sosial. Pelanggaran terhadap ketentuan ini dapat dikenakan sanksi administratif hingga pidana sebagaimana diatur dalam peraturan turunannya.
Lebih jauh lagi, kelalaian dalam menjamin keselamatan kerja dapat masuk dalam ranah pidana berdasarkan Pasal 359 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP), yaitu kelalaian yang menyebabkan hilangnya nyawa orang lain. Dalam praktik hukum, jika terbukti bahwa perusahaan atau pihak terkait lalai dalam memenuhi standar keselamatan dan perlindungan tenaga kerja, maka tanggung jawab pidana dapat dikenakan.
Namun persoalan tidak berhenti pada aspek ketenagakerjaan. Dugaan pelanggaran juga mengarah pada proses pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah. Tender proyek senilai Rp 97,9 miliar yang dimenangkan oleh PT JSE kini menjadi sorotan karena diduga tidak memenuhi prinsip transparansi dan persaingan sehat.
Data yang beredar menunjukkan bahwa nilai kontrak hanya turun sekitar 1% dari Harga Perkiraan Sendiri (HPS) sebesar Rp 99,7 miliar. Dalam praktik pengadaan, selisih yang sangat tipis ini kerap menjadi indikator awal adanya tender yang tidak kompetitif atau bahkan diduga telah “diatur” sebelumnya.
Lebih serius lagi, muncul dugaan bahwa perusahaan pemenang tender tidak memenuhi syarat administrasi, khususnya terkait kewajiban BPJS bagi tenaga kerja. Jika dugaan ini benar, maka proses evaluasi oleh Kelompok Kerja (Pokja) pemilihan dapat dianggap melanggar prinsip dasar pengadaan sebagaimana diatur dalam Peraturan Presiden Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah.
Dalam perspektif hukum pidana, apabila terbukti terdapat persekongkolan dalam proses tender, maka hal ini dapat dijerat dengan Pasal 22 Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, yang melarang persekongkolan dalam penentuan pemenang tender.
Selain itu, jika terdapat unsur penyalahgunaan kewenangan oleh pejabat yang terlibat, maka potensi pelanggaran dapat merambah ke ranah tindak pidana korupsi. Pasal 3 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 jo. UU No 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi menyebutkan bahwa setiap orang yang menyalahgunakan kewenangan yang merugikan keuangan negara dapat dipidana.
Indikasi ini semakin menguat ketika melihat fakta bahwa dari belasan peserta tender, hanya satu perusahaan yang benar-benar mengajukan penawaran hingga tahap akhir. Kondisi ini menimbulkan pertanyaan mendasar: apakah proses tender berjalan secara sehat, atau hanya sekadar formalitas untuk melegitimasi pemenang yang telah ditentukan?
Jika terbukti bahwa proses tersebut direkayasa, maka praktik tersebut dapat dikategorikan sebagai persekongkolan tender horizontal maupun vertikal, yang tidak hanya melanggar hukum administrasi, tetapi juga berpotensi menjadi tindak pidana.
Di sisi lain, proyek Medan Islamic Centre bukan kali pertama menjadi sorotan. Pada tahap sebelumnya, proyek ini juga sempat dikaitkan dengan dugaan kejanggalan dalam pengadaan material, termasuk kasus tanah timbun yang disebut-sebut bernilai miliaran rupiah meskipun materialnya diduga diperoleh tanpa biaya.
Rangkaian peristiwa ini menunjukkan pola yang tidak bisa dianggap kebetulan. Ketika proyek bernilai besar terus diwarnai persoalan—mulai dari efisiensi anggaran, keselamatan kerja, hingga proses tender—maka publik memiliki alasan kuat untuk mempertanyakan integritas tata kelola proyek tersebut.
Dalam konteks pemerintahan, transparansi dan akuntabilitas bukan hanya prinsip, tetapi kewajiban. Kegagalan dalam menjamin kedua hal ini bukan hanya merugikan keuangan negara, tetapi juga dapat mengorbankan keselamatan manusia, sebagaimana yang terjadi dalam kasus ini.
Penting untuk ditegaskan bahwa hingga saat ini belum ada putusan hukum yang menyatakan adanya tindak pidana dalam proyek tersebut. Namun, akumulasi fakta dan dugaan yang berkembang telah memenuhi syarat sebagai indikasi awal (early warning) yang seharusnya segera ditindaklanjuti oleh aparat penegak hukum.
Jika tidak, maka risiko yang lebih besar akan muncul: normalisasi praktik-praktik menyimpang dalam proyek pemerintah, yang pada akhirnya merusak sistem pengadaan dan kepercayaan publik.
Kasus Medan Islamic Centre kini tidak lagi sekadar proyek pembangunan fisik. Ia telah berubah menjadi cermin dari bagaimana tata kelola anggaran publik dijalankan—apakah benar-benar untuk kepentingan rakyat, atau justru menjadi ruang bagi praktik-praktik yang menyimpang.
Pertanyaan yang kini mengemuka bukan lagi sekadar siapa yang salah, tetapi sejauh mana negara hadir untuk memastikan keadilan—baik bagi pekerja yang menjadi korban, maupun bagi publik yang berhak atas transparansi penggunaan uang negara.
Jika dugaan-dugaan ini terbukti, maka kasus ini berpotensi menjadi salah satu contoh nyata bagaimana kelalaian administratif, pelanggaran prosedur, dan dugaan penyimpangan dapat berkelindan dalam satu proyek besar. Dan seperti banyak kasus sebelumnya, semuanya seringkali baru terungkap setelah ada korban.
PENUTUP TAJAM
Kasus ini masih dalam tahap dugaan, namun satu hal sudah jelas:
ketika proyek bernilai ratusan miliar berjalan tanpa pengawasan ketat, maka yang dipertaruhkan bukan hanya uang negara—tetapi juga nyawa manusia.
Following a few of the internal links revealed more posts of similar quality, and a stop at BioTecMedics added more to that growing pile, sites where internal links lead to more good content rather than to more of the same recycled material are sites with depth and this one has clearly built that depth carefully.
A clean read with no irritations, and a look at BrahmansHome continued that frictionless quality, the absence of small irritations is something I notice only when present elsewhere and this site is one of the rare places where everything just works and lets me focus on the substance rather than fighting the format.
Once you start reading carefully here it is hard to go back to lower quality alternatives, and a stop at eleanakonstantellos reinforced that ratchet effect, the way good content raises standards is real over time and this site has clearly contributed to raising my expectations for what is possible in writing on the topic generally.
This stands out compared to similar posts I have read recently, less noise and more substance, and a look at MotoCitee kept that gap going, you can really feel the difference between content made by someone who cares versus content made to fill a publishing schedule for an algorithm trying to keep growing somehow.
A quiet kind of confidence runs through the writing, and a look at LastMinute-Corporate carried that same understated assurance, confidence without bragging is the most attractive register for online writing and the writers here have clearly developed it through practice rather than affecting it through stylistic tricks that would feel hollow eventually.
Now wondering how the writers calibrated the level of detail so well, and a stop at wellthwithcallie continued the same calibration, the right level of detail is one of the harder editorial calls in any piece and this site has clearly developed an instinct for it through what I assume is years of careful practice publicly.
Worth flagging this site to a few specific friends who would appreciate the editorial sensibility, and a look at bantonwoodson added more pages I will mention to them, recommending sites to specific people requires understanding both the site and the person and this site is making those personalised recommendations easy and natural for me.
Now realising the post solved a small problem I had been carrying for weeks, and a look at getdianefarr extended that problem solving function, content that connects to specific unresolved questions in my own life rather than just providing general interest is content with real practical impact and this site is providing that practical value.
Thanks for laying this out in a way that someone newer to the topic can follow, and a stop at corecompanynyc kept that accessibility going, writing that meets readers at different experience levels without condescending is hard to do well and the writers here have clearly thought about who they are writing for.
Different in a good way from the cookie cutter content that fills most blogs covering this area, and a stop at shopthomasashbourne kept showing me why, original thoughtful writing exists if you know where to look and this site has earned a place on my short list of those rare exceptions worth defending.
Thank you for being clear and direct, that simple approach saves so much frustration on the reader’s end, and a stop at mandalynnswim only made me more sure of it, the rest of the content seems to follow the same pattern which is a great sign of consistent editorial care behind the scenes.
Most attempts at writing on this topic feel like they are missing something and this post finally identified what was missing, and a look at missionsaveher extended that diagnostic clarity, content that names what is wrong with adjacent treatments while doing better itself is content with both critical and constructive value and this site has both.
Came in skeptical and left mostly convinced, that is the highest praise I can offer, and a look at findbrynjack pushed me further in the same direction, content that survives a critical first read is rare and worth recognising because most blog posts crumble under any real scrutiny these days when you actually pay attention closely.
Reading this slowly to absorb the structure, and the structure is doing real work alongside the words, and a look at blueprinttobreakup maintained the same architectural quality, when sentence shapes and paragraph rhythms reinforce the meaning rather than just transporting words you know you are reading skilled work today.
Got something practical out of this that I can apply later this week, and a stop at longislandhomesforheroes added more details to think about, this is exactly the kind of content I bookmark for future reference rather than the throwaway listicles that dominate most search results these days for almost any common topic.
Just want to record that this site is entering my regular reading list, and a look at ChelseaBarracksKitchen confirmed it deserves the spot, my regular reading list is short and well curated and adding to it requires meeting a fairly high quality bar that this site has clearly cleared without much effort apparently.
Definitely returning here, that is decided, and a look at caskadekitchenandbar only made the case stronger, this is one of those rare websites that rewards regular visits rather than feeling stale after the first read which is something I cannot say about most of the places I bookmark today across all my topics.
The lack of unnecessary jargon made the post accessible without sacrificing accuracy, and a look at charitybowl50 continued in the same accessible style, technical topics often hide behind specialised vocabulary but here the writer trusts the reader to keep up with plain language and that trust pays off nicely throughout the entire post.
Now leaving a small mental note to recommend this when the topic comes up in conversation, and a look at vaccintelacounty extended that recommend ready feeling, content that arms me with shareable references for likely future conversations is content with social value and this site is providing that conversational ammunition consistently for me lately.
Felt the post was written for someone like me without explicitly addressing me, and a look at helioflow produced the same fit, when content lands on its target without pandering you know the writer has done careful audience thinking rather than relying on demographic targeting or interest signals to do the work of editorial decisions.
Thanks for the breakdown, it gave me a clearer picture of something I had been confused about for a while now, and a stop at tracycantu closed the remaining gaps in my understanding nicely, no need to hunt around twenty other articles to put the pieces together which is a real time saver.
Considered alongside other sources I have been reading this one consistently rises to the top, and a stop at xylawise maintained that top ranking, the informal ongoing comparison between sources is something I do whenever reading on a topic and this site keeps coming out near the top of those comparisons over many sessions.
Worth flagging that this approach to the topic is fresh without being contrarian, and a stop at thriveperk extended the same fresh angle, finding original perspective on familiar subjects is rare and this site has clearly developed its own way of seeing rather than echoing the dominant takes from elsewhere consistently.
Probably worth setting aside a longer block to read more carefully than I can right now, and a stop at softcrest confirmed the longer block plan, the impulse to schedule dedicated time for a sites archive is itself a measure of trust and this site has earned that scheduling impulse from me clearly today actually.
Good post, the kind that respects the reader by getting to the point quickly without skipping the details that matter, and a short look at blog44which confirmed that approach is consistent across the site which is rare to find online these days, definitely a place I will return to soon.
Worth flagging this site to a few specific friends who would appreciate the editorial sensibility, and a look at blog66grounds added more pages I will mention to them, recommending sites to specific people requires understanding both the site and the person and this site is making those personalised recommendations easy and natural for me.
A piece that reads as if the writer trusted readers to fill in obvious gaps, and a look at blog66nights continued that respectful approach, content that does not over explain what the reader can infer is content that respects intelligence and this site has clearly chosen to write to capable readers rather than to the lowest common denominator.
A nicely understated post that does not shout for attention, and a look at jameslutz maintained the same quiet quality, understatement is a stylistic choice that distinguishes serious writing from attention seeking writing and this site has clearly committed to the understated approach as a core editorial value rather than just a phase.
Thanks for keeping the writing direct without losing the warmth that makes content feel human, and a stop at websupreme carried both qualities forward, balancing professionalism and personality is a rare skill and the writers here have clearly figured out how to consistently land it across many posts which I notice.
Reading this gave me the rare experience of fully agreeing with all the conclusions, and a stop at webthrive continued that agreement pattern, content that aligns with my existing views without seeming designed to do so is just content that happens to be reasonable and this site reads as reasonable rather than ideological mostly.
Thanks for treating the topic with the seriousness it deserves without becoming pompous about it, and a stop at datamonarch continued that balanced treatment, the gap between earnest and self serious is huge and writers who can stay on the right side of it earn my respect when I find them online today.