Korban Jiwa, Dugaan Pelanggaran BPJS hingga Indikasi Persekongkolan Tender Rp 97,9 Miliar
Medan – Kasus kecelakaan kerja yang menewaskan seorang pekerja di proyek Medan Islamic Centre membuka tabir persoalan serius dalam tata kelola proyek pemerintah. Dari dugaan pelanggaran kewajiban BPJS hingga indikasi persekongkolan tender bernilai Rp 97,9 miliar, proyek strategis milik Pemerintah Kota Medan ini kini berada di bawah sorotan publik dan berpotensi mengarah pada pelanggaran hukum administrasi hingga pidana.
Pembangunan Medan Islamic Centre (MIC) yang digadang sebagai ikon baru peradaban Islam di Sumatera Utara justru menyisakan tanda tanya besar. Proyek bernilai ratusan miliar rupiah tersebut tidak hanya menghadapi persoalan teknis, tetapi juga mulai diwarnai dugaan pelanggaran serius yang berpotensi menyeret pihak-pihak terkait ke ranah hukum.
Proyek yang dikelola oleh Dinas Perumahan, Kawasan Permukiman, Cipta Karya dan Tata Ruang (Perkimcikataru) Kota Medan ini menjadi sorotan setelah seorang pekerja bernama Wahyu Suprio meninggal dunia dalam kecelakaan kerja. Fakta yang mengemuka menunjukkan bahwa korban tidak terdaftar sebagai peserta BPJS Ketenagakerjaan, padahal hal tersebut merupakan kewajiban dasar dalam proyek konstruksi yang menggunakan anggaran negara.
Dalam konteks hukum, kondisi ini berpotensi melanggar Pasal 15 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2011 tentang BPJS, yang secara tegas menyatakan bahwa pemberi kerja wajib mendaftarkan pekerjanya dalam program jaminan sosial. Pelanggaran terhadap ketentuan ini dapat dikenakan sanksi administratif hingga pidana sebagaimana diatur dalam peraturan turunannya.
Lebih jauh lagi, kelalaian dalam menjamin keselamatan kerja dapat masuk dalam ranah pidana berdasarkan Pasal 359 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP), yaitu kelalaian yang menyebabkan hilangnya nyawa orang lain. Dalam praktik hukum, jika terbukti bahwa perusahaan atau pihak terkait lalai dalam memenuhi standar keselamatan dan perlindungan tenaga kerja, maka tanggung jawab pidana dapat dikenakan.
Namun persoalan tidak berhenti pada aspek ketenagakerjaan. Dugaan pelanggaran juga mengarah pada proses pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah. Tender proyek senilai Rp 97,9 miliar yang dimenangkan oleh PT JSE kini menjadi sorotan karena diduga tidak memenuhi prinsip transparansi dan persaingan sehat.
Data yang beredar menunjukkan bahwa nilai kontrak hanya turun sekitar 1% dari Harga Perkiraan Sendiri (HPS) sebesar Rp 99,7 miliar. Dalam praktik pengadaan, selisih yang sangat tipis ini kerap menjadi indikator awal adanya tender yang tidak kompetitif atau bahkan diduga telah “diatur” sebelumnya.
Lebih serius lagi, muncul dugaan bahwa perusahaan pemenang tender tidak memenuhi syarat administrasi, khususnya terkait kewajiban BPJS bagi tenaga kerja. Jika dugaan ini benar, maka proses evaluasi oleh Kelompok Kerja (Pokja) pemilihan dapat dianggap melanggar prinsip dasar pengadaan sebagaimana diatur dalam Peraturan Presiden Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah.
Dalam perspektif hukum pidana, apabila terbukti terdapat persekongkolan dalam proses tender, maka hal ini dapat dijerat dengan Pasal 22 Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, yang melarang persekongkolan dalam penentuan pemenang tender.
Selain itu, jika terdapat unsur penyalahgunaan kewenangan oleh pejabat yang terlibat, maka potensi pelanggaran dapat merambah ke ranah tindak pidana korupsi. Pasal 3 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 jo. UU No 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi menyebutkan bahwa setiap orang yang menyalahgunakan kewenangan yang merugikan keuangan negara dapat dipidana.
Indikasi ini semakin menguat ketika melihat fakta bahwa dari belasan peserta tender, hanya satu perusahaan yang benar-benar mengajukan penawaran hingga tahap akhir. Kondisi ini menimbulkan pertanyaan mendasar: apakah proses tender berjalan secara sehat, atau hanya sekadar formalitas untuk melegitimasi pemenang yang telah ditentukan?
Jika terbukti bahwa proses tersebut direkayasa, maka praktik tersebut dapat dikategorikan sebagai persekongkolan tender horizontal maupun vertikal, yang tidak hanya melanggar hukum administrasi, tetapi juga berpotensi menjadi tindak pidana.
Di sisi lain, proyek Medan Islamic Centre bukan kali pertama menjadi sorotan. Pada tahap sebelumnya, proyek ini juga sempat dikaitkan dengan dugaan kejanggalan dalam pengadaan material, termasuk kasus tanah timbun yang disebut-sebut bernilai miliaran rupiah meskipun materialnya diduga diperoleh tanpa biaya.
Rangkaian peristiwa ini menunjukkan pola yang tidak bisa dianggap kebetulan. Ketika proyek bernilai besar terus diwarnai persoalan—mulai dari efisiensi anggaran, keselamatan kerja, hingga proses tender—maka publik memiliki alasan kuat untuk mempertanyakan integritas tata kelola proyek tersebut.
Dalam konteks pemerintahan, transparansi dan akuntabilitas bukan hanya prinsip, tetapi kewajiban. Kegagalan dalam menjamin kedua hal ini bukan hanya merugikan keuangan negara, tetapi juga dapat mengorbankan keselamatan manusia, sebagaimana yang terjadi dalam kasus ini.
Penting untuk ditegaskan bahwa hingga saat ini belum ada putusan hukum yang menyatakan adanya tindak pidana dalam proyek tersebut. Namun, akumulasi fakta dan dugaan yang berkembang telah memenuhi syarat sebagai indikasi awal (early warning) yang seharusnya segera ditindaklanjuti oleh aparat penegak hukum.
Jika tidak, maka risiko yang lebih besar akan muncul: normalisasi praktik-praktik menyimpang dalam proyek pemerintah, yang pada akhirnya merusak sistem pengadaan dan kepercayaan publik.
Kasus Medan Islamic Centre kini tidak lagi sekadar proyek pembangunan fisik. Ia telah berubah menjadi cermin dari bagaimana tata kelola anggaran publik dijalankan—apakah benar-benar untuk kepentingan rakyat, atau justru menjadi ruang bagi praktik-praktik yang menyimpang.
Pertanyaan yang kini mengemuka bukan lagi sekadar siapa yang salah, tetapi sejauh mana negara hadir untuk memastikan keadilan—baik bagi pekerja yang menjadi korban, maupun bagi publik yang berhak atas transparansi penggunaan uang negara.
Jika dugaan-dugaan ini terbukti, maka kasus ini berpotensi menjadi salah satu contoh nyata bagaimana kelalaian administratif, pelanggaran prosedur, dan dugaan penyimpangan dapat berkelindan dalam satu proyek besar. Dan seperti banyak kasus sebelumnya, semuanya seringkali baru terungkap setelah ada korban.
PENUTUP TAJAM
Kasus ini masih dalam tahap dugaan, namun satu hal sudah jelas:
ketika proyek bernilai ratusan miliar berjalan tanpa pengawasan ketat, maka yang dipertaruhkan bukan hanya uang negara—tetapi juga nyawa manusia.
The use of plain language without dumbing down the topic was really well done, and a look at unitybondcollective continued in that same accessible style, this is something many technical writers fail at because they either confuse their readers or condescend to them but here neither problem appears at all which is impressive really.
Took a quick scan first and then went back to read properly because the post deserved it, and a stop at unityharbor kept me reading carefully too, the kind of writing that earns a slower second pass rather than getting skimmed and forgotten is something I value highly when I happen to find it.
Now feeling confident enough in this site to use it as a reference point for evaluating others on the same topic, and a look at trustcraft continued the comparison friendly quality, sites that serve as quality benchmarks for their topic are precious and this one has clearly become a benchmark for me on this particular subject area.
Well done, the kind of post that makes you slow down and actually read instead of skimming for keywords, and a look at unitycrest kept me reading carefully too, that is a sign of writing that has been crafted rather than churned out for an algorithm to see today and tomorrow.
Reading this prompted a brief but useful conversation with a colleague who happened to walk by, and a stop at actionwithstructure extended that conversational seed, content that becomes a starting point for in person discussion rather than ending in solitary reading is content with social generative energy and this site has plenty of it apparently.
Really grateful for content like this, it does not waste my time and it does not insult my intelligence either, and a quick look at buildgrowthsystems was the same, balanced respectful writing that makes a person feel welcome rather than rushed through pages of forced engagement just to keep clicking around.
Decided to write a short note to the author if there is contact info anywhere, and a stop at trustcontinuum extended that intention, the urge to thank the writer directly is a strong signal of content quality and this site has triggered that urge in me today which is a fairly rare event for my reading.
Honest assessment is that this is one of the better short reads I have had this week, and a look at executeprogress reinforced that, the bar for short content is low because most of it sacrifices substance for brevity but this site manages both at once which is harder than it sounds for most writers attempting it.
Reading this gave me a small framework I expect to use going forward, and a stop at actionmapsuccess extended that framework, content that produces transferable mental models rather than just specific facts is content with multiplicative value and this site is providing those models at a rate that justifies extra attention from me regularly.
Learned something from this without having to dig through layers of fluff, and a stop at capitalbondhub added a bit more context that helped tie things together for me, definitely a useful corner of the internet for anyone who wants real information without the usual marketing nonsense around it that often ruins similar pages.
Really grateful for content like this, it does not waste my time and it does not insult my intelligence either, and a quick look at strategyforwardpath was the same, balanced respectful writing that makes a person feel welcome rather than rushed through pages of forced engagement just to keep clicking around.
Felt the post was written for someone like me without explicitly addressing me, and a look at forwardplanninglab produced the same fit, when content lands on its target without pandering you know the writer has done careful audience thinking rather than relying on demographic targeting or interest signals to do the work of editorial decisions.
Decided to read this site for a while before forming a verdict, and the verdict after several pages is positive, and a stop at capitalbonded continued that pattern, judging a site requires more than one post and giving sites a fair sample is something I try to do for promising candidates rather than rushing to dismiss.
Once you start reading carefully here it is hard to go back to lower quality alternatives, and a stop at buildclearoutcomes reinforced that ratchet effect, the way good content raises standards is real over time and this site has clearly contributed to raising my expectations for what is possible in writing on the topic generally.
Closed it feeling slightly more competent in the topic than I started, and a stop at ideasneedmotion reinforced that competence boost, real learning is rare in casual online reading but it does happen sometimes and this site managed to make it happen for me today which is genuinely worth pausing to acknowledge.
A nicely understated post that does not shout for attention, and a look at trustsynergy maintained the same quiet quality, understatement is a stylistic choice that distinguishes serious writing from attention seeking writing and this site has clearly committed to the understated approach as a core editorial value rather than just a phase.
Well structured and easy to read, that combination is rarer than people think, and a stop at signalthefuture confirmed the same standard runs across the rest of the site, definitely the kind of place I will be coming back to when this topic comes up in conversation later again over the weeks ahead.
Just dropping by to say thanks for the effort, it does not go unnoticed when a writer cares this much about the reader, and after I went through capitalbondcraft I was certain this is one of the better corners of the internet for this particular kind of content which is genuinely refreshing.
Even across multiple posts the writers voice has remained consistent in a way I appreciate, and a stop at growthledger continued that voice, sites that maintain editorial consistency across many pieces have something most sites lack and this one has clearly worked out how to keep its voice steady across what reads as a growing archive.
Now recognising the editorial wisdom of letting some questions remain open at the end, and a look at bondedgrowth continued that intellectual honesty, content that does not force closure on contested questions is content that respects the limits of knowledge and this site has clearly developed the maturity to know when to leave space.
Once you start reading carefully here it is hard to go back to lower quality alternatives, and a stop at bondedhorizon reinforced that ratchet effect, the way good content raises standards is real over time and this site has clearly contributed to raising my expectations for what is possible in writing on the topic generally.
Coming to this with low expectations and being pleasantly surprised by the substance, and a stop at securecapitalbond continued exceeding expectations, the recalibration of expectations upward across multiple positive readings is one of the actual rewards of careful browsing and this site is providing that recalibration at a steady rate apparently.
Felt the post had been written without using a single buzzword, and a look at secureunity continued that clean vocabulary, content free of jargon and trendy phrases reads better and ages better and this site has clearly committed to a vocabulary that will not feel dated in three years which is impressive editorially.
Found something quietly useful here that I expect to return to, and a stop at trustalignment added more of the same, content with quiet utility ages well in a way that flashy hot takes do not and I have learned to weight quiet utility much higher when deciding what to bookmark for later use.
A piece that handled the topic with appropriate weight without becoming portentous, and a look at unitypillar continued that calibrated seriousness, content that takes itself seriously without becoming pompous is something this site has clearly figured out and the balance shows up in every piece I have read across multiple sessions now.
Looking back on this reading session it stands as one of the better ones recently, and a look at bondedlegacyline extended that ranking, the informal ranking of reading sessions against each other is something I do mentally and this session ranks high largely because of this site and a couple of related pages here.
Excellent post, balanced and well organised without showing off, and a stop at trustconverge continued in that same vein, this site has clearly figured out the formula for content that works for readers rather than for search engine ranking signals which is harder than it sounds today and worth real recognition from anyone.
Really like that there are no exclamation marks or all caps shouting throughout the post, and a quick visit to unitytrustworks maintained the same calm voice, restraint in punctuation signals confidence in the content and this site clearly trusts its substance to do the persuading rather than relying on typographic emphasis.
Most of my reading time goes to a small number of trusted sources and this one is now joining that group, and a stop at trustlinecore reinforced the group membership, the few sites that earn a place in my regular rotation are sites I expect ongoing returns from and this one has earned that elevated position consistently.
Will share this on a forum I am part of where it will be appreciated by others working in the same area, and a look at explorelongtermgrowth suggests there is more here worth passing along too, definitely a generous resource that deserves a wider audience than it probably has today across the open internet.
Got pulled in by the headline and stayed because the content actually delivered on the promise, and a stop at learnandimprovecontinuously kept that trust intact, when a site lives up to its own framing it earns the right to keep showing up in my browser tabs going forward indefinitely from here on out really.
Reading this gave me something to think about for the rest of the afternoon, and after futurefocusedalliances I had even more to mull over, the kind of post that lingers in the background of your day rather than evaporating immediately is genuinely valuable in an attention economy that punishes depth rather than rewarding it.
This one is staying open in a tab for the rest of the day so I can come back and re read certain parts, and a look at secureonlinepurchasehub suggests I will be doing the same with a few more pages here too, this is going to be a deep dive over the coming hours.
Most of my reading time goes to a small number of trusted sources and this one is now joining that group, and a stop at bestvaluemarketonline reinforced the group membership, the few sites that earn a place in my regular rotation are sites I expect ongoing returns from and this one has earned that elevated position consistently.
Now sitting with the thoughts the post triggered rather than rushing on to the next thing, and a stop at corporateunitysolutions extended that reflective pause, content that earns time for thought after closing the tab is content of higher value than the merely interesting and this site has clearly produced that lasting effect today.
Worth recognising the absence of the usual blog tropes here, and a look at trustedmarketalliances continued that fresh quality, sites that avoid the standard moves of the medium read as more original even when the content is on familiar topics and this one has clearly chosen its own path through the conventional terrain skilfully.
Excellent execution from start to finish, the post never loses its rhythm and the points stay sharp, and a quick stop at findyournextdirection kept the same level going, consistency like this across a site is the marker of a serious operation rather than a casual side project running on autopilot somewhere else.
Decided to read more before commenting and the more I read the more I wanted to say something, and a stop at longtermpartnershipnetwork pushed that impulse further, when content provokes the urge to participate rather than just consume it is doing something quite specific and worth recognising clearly when it happens during reading.
Reading this gave me a small framework I expect to use going forward, and a stop at professionalrelationshiphub extended that framework, content that produces transferable mental models rather than just specific facts is content with multiplicative value and this site is providing those models at a rate that justifies extra attention from me regularly.