Korban Jiwa, Dugaan Pelanggaran BPJS hingga Indikasi Persekongkolan Tender Rp 97,9 Miliar
Medan – Kasus kecelakaan kerja yang menewaskan seorang pekerja di proyek Medan Islamic Centre membuka tabir persoalan serius dalam tata kelola proyek pemerintah. Dari dugaan pelanggaran kewajiban BPJS hingga indikasi persekongkolan tender bernilai Rp 97,9 miliar, proyek strategis milik Pemerintah Kota Medan ini kini berada di bawah sorotan publik dan berpotensi mengarah pada pelanggaran hukum administrasi hingga pidana.
Pembangunan Medan Islamic Centre (MIC) yang digadang sebagai ikon baru peradaban Islam di Sumatera Utara justru menyisakan tanda tanya besar. Proyek bernilai ratusan miliar rupiah tersebut tidak hanya menghadapi persoalan teknis, tetapi juga mulai diwarnai dugaan pelanggaran serius yang berpotensi menyeret pihak-pihak terkait ke ranah hukum.
Proyek yang dikelola oleh Dinas Perumahan, Kawasan Permukiman, Cipta Karya dan Tata Ruang (Perkimcikataru) Kota Medan ini menjadi sorotan setelah seorang pekerja bernama Wahyu Suprio meninggal dunia dalam kecelakaan kerja. Fakta yang mengemuka menunjukkan bahwa korban tidak terdaftar sebagai peserta BPJS Ketenagakerjaan, padahal hal tersebut merupakan kewajiban dasar dalam proyek konstruksi yang menggunakan anggaran negara.
Dalam konteks hukum, kondisi ini berpotensi melanggar Pasal 15 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2011 tentang BPJS, yang secara tegas menyatakan bahwa pemberi kerja wajib mendaftarkan pekerjanya dalam program jaminan sosial. Pelanggaran terhadap ketentuan ini dapat dikenakan sanksi administratif hingga pidana sebagaimana diatur dalam peraturan turunannya.
Lebih jauh lagi, kelalaian dalam menjamin keselamatan kerja dapat masuk dalam ranah pidana berdasarkan Pasal 359 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP), yaitu kelalaian yang menyebabkan hilangnya nyawa orang lain. Dalam praktik hukum, jika terbukti bahwa perusahaan atau pihak terkait lalai dalam memenuhi standar keselamatan dan perlindungan tenaga kerja, maka tanggung jawab pidana dapat dikenakan.
Namun persoalan tidak berhenti pada aspek ketenagakerjaan. Dugaan pelanggaran juga mengarah pada proses pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah. Tender proyek senilai Rp 97,9 miliar yang dimenangkan oleh PT JSE kini menjadi sorotan karena diduga tidak memenuhi prinsip transparansi dan persaingan sehat.
Data yang beredar menunjukkan bahwa nilai kontrak hanya turun sekitar 1% dari Harga Perkiraan Sendiri (HPS) sebesar Rp 99,7 miliar. Dalam praktik pengadaan, selisih yang sangat tipis ini kerap menjadi indikator awal adanya tender yang tidak kompetitif atau bahkan diduga telah “diatur” sebelumnya.
Lebih serius lagi, muncul dugaan bahwa perusahaan pemenang tender tidak memenuhi syarat administrasi, khususnya terkait kewajiban BPJS bagi tenaga kerja. Jika dugaan ini benar, maka proses evaluasi oleh Kelompok Kerja (Pokja) pemilihan dapat dianggap melanggar prinsip dasar pengadaan sebagaimana diatur dalam Peraturan Presiden Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah.
Dalam perspektif hukum pidana, apabila terbukti terdapat persekongkolan dalam proses tender, maka hal ini dapat dijerat dengan Pasal 22 Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, yang melarang persekongkolan dalam penentuan pemenang tender.
Selain itu, jika terdapat unsur penyalahgunaan kewenangan oleh pejabat yang terlibat, maka potensi pelanggaran dapat merambah ke ranah tindak pidana korupsi. Pasal 3 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 jo. UU No 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi menyebutkan bahwa setiap orang yang menyalahgunakan kewenangan yang merugikan keuangan negara dapat dipidana.
Indikasi ini semakin menguat ketika melihat fakta bahwa dari belasan peserta tender, hanya satu perusahaan yang benar-benar mengajukan penawaran hingga tahap akhir. Kondisi ini menimbulkan pertanyaan mendasar: apakah proses tender berjalan secara sehat, atau hanya sekadar formalitas untuk melegitimasi pemenang yang telah ditentukan?
Jika terbukti bahwa proses tersebut direkayasa, maka praktik tersebut dapat dikategorikan sebagai persekongkolan tender horizontal maupun vertikal, yang tidak hanya melanggar hukum administrasi, tetapi juga berpotensi menjadi tindak pidana.
Di sisi lain, proyek Medan Islamic Centre bukan kali pertama menjadi sorotan. Pada tahap sebelumnya, proyek ini juga sempat dikaitkan dengan dugaan kejanggalan dalam pengadaan material, termasuk kasus tanah timbun yang disebut-sebut bernilai miliaran rupiah meskipun materialnya diduga diperoleh tanpa biaya.
Rangkaian peristiwa ini menunjukkan pola yang tidak bisa dianggap kebetulan. Ketika proyek bernilai besar terus diwarnai persoalan—mulai dari efisiensi anggaran, keselamatan kerja, hingga proses tender—maka publik memiliki alasan kuat untuk mempertanyakan integritas tata kelola proyek tersebut.
Dalam konteks pemerintahan, transparansi dan akuntabilitas bukan hanya prinsip, tetapi kewajiban. Kegagalan dalam menjamin kedua hal ini bukan hanya merugikan keuangan negara, tetapi juga dapat mengorbankan keselamatan manusia, sebagaimana yang terjadi dalam kasus ini.
Penting untuk ditegaskan bahwa hingga saat ini belum ada putusan hukum yang menyatakan adanya tindak pidana dalam proyek tersebut. Namun, akumulasi fakta dan dugaan yang berkembang telah memenuhi syarat sebagai indikasi awal (early warning) yang seharusnya segera ditindaklanjuti oleh aparat penegak hukum.
Jika tidak, maka risiko yang lebih besar akan muncul: normalisasi praktik-praktik menyimpang dalam proyek pemerintah, yang pada akhirnya merusak sistem pengadaan dan kepercayaan publik.
Kasus Medan Islamic Centre kini tidak lagi sekadar proyek pembangunan fisik. Ia telah berubah menjadi cermin dari bagaimana tata kelola anggaran publik dijalankan—apakah benar-benar untuk kepentingan rakyat, atau justru menjadi ruang bagi praktik-praktik yang menyimpang.
Pertanyaan yang kini mengemuka bukan lagi sekadar siapa yang salah, tetapi sejauh mana negara hadir untuk memastikan keadilan—baik bagi pekerja yang menjadi korban, maupun bagi publik yang berhak atas transparansi penggunaan uang negara.
Jika dugaan-dugaan ini terbukti, maka kasus ini berpotensi menjadi salah satu contoh nyata bagaimana kelalaian administratif, pelanggaran prosedur, dan dugaan penyimpangan dapat berkelindan dalam satu proyek besar. Dan seperti banyak kasus sebelumnya, semuanya seringkali baru terungkap setelah ada korban.
PENUTUP TAJAM
Kasus ini masih dalam tahap dugaan, namun satu hal sudah jelas:
ketika proyek bernilai ratusan miliar berjalan tanpa pengawasan ketat, maka yang dipertaruhkan bukan hanya uang negara—tetapi juga nyawa manusia.
Honestly this kind of writing is why I still bother to read independent sites, and a look at actionplanner extended that broader reflection, the few sites that justify continued attention to non algorithmic content are sites like this one and finding them periodically is enough to keep my reading habits oriented toward independent rather than aggregated content.
Now setting this aside as a model of how to write thoughtfully on the topic, and a stop at directionanchorsmotion extended that model status, content that becomes a reference for how a kind of writing should be done is content with influence beyond its own readership and this site is reaching that level for me clearly today.
Glad to have another data point on a question I am still thinking through, and a look at momentumwithmeaning added two more, content that acknowledges its place in a wider conversation rather than pretending to settle the question alone is intellectually honest in a way that I wish was more common across the open web.
Came here from another site and ended up exploring much further than I planned, and a look at focusbuildsvelocity only encouraged more exploration, the kind of place where one click leads to another not through manipulative design but through genuinely interesting content is rare and worth highlighting when found like this somewhere on the open internet.
Honest reaction is that I want to send this to a friend who would benefit from it, and a look at focusunlockspath added more material I will pass along too, the impulse to share is the strongest signal I have for content quality and this site is generating that impulse cleanly across multiple posts.
Stands apart from similar pages by actually being useful, that is high praise these days, and a look at claritymeetsaction kept that standard going, you can tell when a site is built around the reader versus around metrics and this one clearly belongs to the first category for sure based on what I read.
Reading this prompted me to send the link to two different people for two different reasons, and a stop at moveideaswithpurpose provided ammunition for a third share, content that suits multiple audiences without being generic enough to be useless to any of them is genuinely valuable and this site has that multi audience quality clearly.
Now thinking about whether the writer might publish a longer form work I would buy, and a look at moveideasforwardclean suggested the same depth would translate, content that makes me want to pay for related work in other formats is content that has earned commercial trust as well as attention trust and this site has both clearly.
Now recognising that this site has earned a place in the small group of resources I treat as authoritative, and a stop at growthneedsalignment confirmed that placement, the difference between resources I trust and resources I just consume is real and this site has clearly moved into the trusted category through consistent quality over time.
Decided to subscribe to the RSS feed if there is one, and a stop at buildforwardlogic confirmed that decision, content that I want delivered to me proactively rather than just remembered when I have time is content that has earned a higher level of commitment from me as a reader looking for reliable sources.
Closed the tab and immediately reopened it ten minutes later because I wanted to reread a part, and a stop at growthtrajectory drew the same return, content that pulls you back after closing it is doing something well beyond the average and worth marking as exceptional in my mental catalogue of reliable sites.
Reading this in pieces during a long afternoon and finding it consistently rewarding, and a stop at actiondrive fit naturally into the same fragmented reading pattern, sites whose posts can be read in segments without losing the thread are well suited to how I actually read these days and this one is built well.
Reading this on a slow Sunday and finding it perfectly suited to a slow Sunday read, and a quick stop at clarityfirstaction kept the same gentle pace, content that fits the mood of the moment is something I notice and remember and this site has the kind of pace that suits relaxed reading sessions especially well.
Felt the post had been written without using a single buzzword, and a look at claritydrivenmoves continued that clean vocabulary, content free of jargon and trendy phrases reads better and ages better and this site has clearly committed to a vocabulary that will not feel dated in three years which is impressive editorially.
After reading several posts back to back the consistent voice across them is impressive, and a stop at growthinmotion continued that voice consistency, sites that maintain a single coherent voice across many pieces by potentially many writers represent serious editorial discipline and this one has clearly developed the institutional consistency needed for that.
Felt like the post had been edited rather than just drafted and published, and a stop at actioncreatesdirection suggested the same care across the site, the difference between edited and unedited content is enormous for the reader and this site has clearly invested in the editing pass that most blogs skip entirely which really does show up.
Speaking as someone who used to recommend blogs frequently and got out of the habit this site is rekindling that impulse, and a look at actioncreatespace extended the rekindling, the recovery of an old habit triggered by encountering work that justifies it is itself a small kind of pleasure and this site is providing that recovery experience.
Now setting aside time on my next free afternoon to read more from the archives, and a stop at buildtractionnow confirmed that time will be well spent, the rare site whose archive deserves a dedicated reading session rather than just casual sampling is the kind of resource worth scheduling around and this one qualifies clearly.
Skipped the social share buttons but might come back to actually use one later, and a stop at actionoverhesitation extended that share urge, content that triggers genuine sharing impulses rather than performative ones is content that has actually moved me and not many posts in a typical week do that for me actually.
Skipped the social share buttons but might come back to actually use one later, and a stop at clarityturnskeys extended that share urge, content that triggers genuine sharing impulses rather than performative ones is content that has actually moved me and not many posts in a typical week do that for me actually.
Now adding the writer to a small mental list of voices I want to follow, and a look at focusbeatsfriction reinforced that follow intention, the few writers whose work I actively track are writers who have demonstrated sustained quality and this writer has clearly demonstrated that sustained quality across the pieces I have sampled here today.
Appreciated the way each section connected smoothly to the next without abrupt jumps, and a stop at ideasneedexecutionnow kept that flow going nicely, transitions are something most blog writers ignore but the difference is huge for the reader who is trying to follow a sustained line of thought today across many different topics.
Most blog writing on this subject reaches for the same handful of arguments and this post avoided them, and a look at signalshapessuccess continued the original treatment, content that finds its own path through territory other writers have flattened is content with real authorial energy and this site has plenty of that distinctive energy.
Reading this slowly and letting each paragraph land before moving on, and a stop at clarityroute earned the same patient approach, content that rewards slow reading rather than speed is content with real density and the writers here are clearly producing work that benefits from the careful eye rather than the rushed scan.
Now wondering how the writers calibrated the level of detail so well, and a stop at actionleadsforward continued the same calibration, the right level of detail is one of the harder editorial calls in any piece and this site has clearly developed an instinct for it through what I assume is years of careful practice publicly.
Really appreciate the absence of stock photos that have nothing to do with the content, and a quick visit to actionwithsignal maintained the same restraint, visual filler is a tell that the writing cannot stand on its own and the lack of it here suggests the team has confidence in their content quality alone.
Got something practical out of this that I can apply later this week, and a stop at ideasunlockmovement added more details to think about, this is exactly the kind of content I bookmark for future reference rather than the throwaway listicles that dominate most search results these days for almost any common topic.
A piece that ended with a clean landing rather than fading out, and a look at signalcreatesclarity maintained the same crisp conclusions, endings that resolve rather than dissolve are a sign of careful structural thinking and this site has clearly invested in how its pieces conclude rather than letting them simply run out of energy.
A piece that took its time without dragging, and a look at actioncycle kept the same patient pace, the difference between unhurried and slow is a fine editorial distinction and this site has clearly found the unhurried side without slipping into the slow side which would have lost me as a reader quickly otherwise.
Picked up a couple of new ideas here that I can actually try out, and after my visit to forwardenergyhub I have even more notes saved, this is the kind of resource that pays you back for the time you spend on it which is rare to come across in this corner of the web.
Comfortable reading experience throughout, no jarring tone shifts and no awkward formatting, and a look at progresswithdirectionalforce kept that smooth feel going, the kind of editorial polish that goes unnoticed when present but glaring when absent is something this site has clearly invested in across the broader content as well which deserves recognition.
In the middle of an otherwise scattered day this post landed as a moment of focus, and a stop at progresswithsignal extended that focused feeling across more pages, content that anchors a fragmented day rather than contributing to the fragmentation is content with real centring effect and this site is providing that anchoring function for me.
Came in expecting another generic take and got something with actual character instead, and a look at motioncreatesresults carried that personality forward, finding a distinct voice on a saturated topic is impressive and worth pointing out when it happens because most sites end up sounding identical to their nearest competitors quickly.
Reading this in the time it took to drink half a cup of coffee, and a stop at directionsetsspeed fit naturally into the second half, content that respects the rhythms of a typical morning is content with practical fit and this site has the kind of length and pacing that works for the way I actually read.
Reading this in three sittings because the day was fragmented, and the piece survived the fragmentation, and a stop at actionunlocksclarity held up under similar reading conditions, content engineered for continuous attention is fragile in modern conditions and this site reads as durable across the realistic ways people consume content today.
My usual pattern is to skim and bounce but this site has reset that pattern temporarily, and a stop at actionignitesgrowth maintained the slower reading mode, content that changes how I read is content with structural influence and this site has clearly nudged my reading behaviour toward something better at least for the duration of these visits.
Honestly impressed, did not expect to find this level of care on the topic, and a stop at progressunlocked cemented the impression, you can tell within the first few paragraphs whether a site is going to be worth the time and this one delivered on that early promise nicely throughout the rest of what I read.
Quietly the writers approach to the topic differs from the dominant takes I have been encountering, and a stop at buildmomentumclean extended that distinctive approach, content that maintains a different perspective without explicitly arguing against the dominant ones is content with confident editorial identity and this site has that confidence throughout pieces.
A piece that did not waste any of its substance on sales or promotion, and a look at growthwithforwardmotion continued that pure content focus, sites that resist the urge to monetise every paragraph are increasingly rare and this one has clearly made the editorial choice to keep the writing clean from commercial intrusion which I value highly.
Found this through a search that was generic enough I did not expect quality results, and a look at momentumbychoice continued the surprisingly good experience, search engines occasionally still surface excellent independent content if you scroll past the obvious paid and high authority results which is reassuring to remember sometimes.
My usual pattern is to skim and bounce but this site has reset that pattern temporarily, and a stop at claritydrivesvelocity maintained the slower reading mode, content that changes how I read is content with structural influence and this site has clearly nudged my reading behaviour toward something better at least for the duration of these visits.
I came here looking for a quick answer and ended up reading the whole post because it was actually interesting, and after signaldrivenmomentum I had a much fuller picture, no stress and no confusion just a clear walk through the topic that made everything fall into place without much effort.
Came away with some new perspectives I had not considered before, and after clarityguidesexecution those ideas felt more complete, the kind of content that stays with you a little while after reading rather than slipping out the moment you switch tabs and move on with your day to whatever comes next.
Came here from another site and ended up exploring much further than I planned, and a look at directionisleverage only encouraged more exploration, the kind of place where one click leads to another not through manipulative design but through genuinely interesting content is rare and worth highlighting when found like this somewhere on the open internet.
Stands apart from similar pages by actually being useful, that is high praise these days, and a look at growthfollowsfocus kept that standard going, you can tell when a site is built around the reader versus around metrics and this one clearly belongs to the first category for sure based on what I read.
Comfortable read, finished it without realising how much time had passed, and a look at growthchannel pulled me into more pages the same way, the absence of friction in good content lets time disappear and that is one of the highest compliments I can pay any piece of writing I find online during a regular search session.
Reading this prompted me to dig out an old reference book related to the topic, and a stop at forwardlogiclab extended that connection to other sources, content that connects me back to my own existing knowledge rather than asking me to forget it is content with continuity and this site has that continuous quality.
Now feeling the rare pleasure of trusting a source completely on first encounter, and a look at buildsmartmotion extended that initial trust into something more durable, the calibration of trust to evidence is something I do informally and this site has earned high trust through the cumulative weight of multiple consistently good posts already.
A clear case of writing that does not try to do too much in one post, and a look at motionwithclarity maintained the same scoped discipline, posts that try to cover too much end up covering nothing well and this site has clearly chosen scope discipline as a core editorial principle which shows up clearly in what I read.
Honestly the simplicity of the explanation made the topic click for me in a way other writeups had not, and a look at clarityshapesspeed continued that clarity into related areas, when a writer gets the level of explanation right the reader does the heavy lifting themselves and the post just enables it.