Korban Jiwa, Dugaan Pelanggaran BPJS hingga Indikasi Persekongkolan Tender Rp 97,9 Miliar
Medan – Kasus kecelakaan kerja yang menewaskan seorang pekerja di proyek Medan Islamic Centre membuka tabir persoalan serius dalam tata kelola proyek pemerintah. Dari dugaan pelanggaran kewajiban BPJS hingga indikasi persekongkolan tender bernilai Rp 97,9 miliar, proyek strategis milik Pemerintah Kota Medan ini kini berada di bawah sorotan publik dan berpotensi mengarah pada pelanggaran hukum administrasi hingga pidana.
Pembangunan Medan Islamic Centre (MIC) yang digadang sebagai ikon baru peradaban Islam di Sumatera Utara justru menyisakan tanda tanya besar. Proyek bernilai ratusan miliar rupiah tersebut tidak hanya menghadapi persoalan teknis, tetapi juga mulai diwarnai dugaan pelanggaran serius yang berpotensi menyeret pihak-pihak terkait ke ranah hukum.
Proyek yang dikelola oleh Dinas Perumahan, Kawasan Permukiman, Cipta Karya dan Tata Ruang (Perkimcikataru) Kota Medan ini menjadi sorotan setelah seorang pekerja bernama Wahyu Suprio meninggal dunia dalam kecelakaan kerja. Fakta yang mengemuka menunjukkan bahwa korban tidak terdaftar sebagai peserta BPJS Ketenagakerjaan, padahal hal tersebut merupakan kewajiban dasar dalam proyek konstruksi yang menggunakan anggaran negara.
Dalam konteks hukum, kondisi ini berpotensi melanggar Pasal 15 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2011 tentang BPJS, yang secara tegas menyatakan bahwa pemberi kerja wajib mendaftarkan pekerjanya dalam program jaminan sosial. Pelanggaran terhadap ketentuan ini dapat dikenakan sanksi administratif hingga pidana sebagaimana diatur dalam peraturan turunannya.
Lebih jauh lagi, kelalaian dalam menjamin keselamatan kerja dapat masuk dalam ranah pidana berdasarkan Pasal 359 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP), yaitu kelalaian yang menyebabkan hilangnya nyawa orang lain. Dalam praktik hukum, jika terbukti bahwa perusahaan atau pihak terkait lalai dalam memenuhi standar keselamatan dan perlindungan tenaga kerja, maka tanggung jawab pidana dapat dikenakan.
Namun persoalan tidak berhenti pada aspek ketenagakerjaan. Dugaan pelanggaran juga mengarah pada proses pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah. Tender proyek senilai Rp 97,9 miliar yang dimenangkan oleh PT JSE kini menjadi sorotan karena diduga tidak memenuhi prinsip transparansi dan persaingan sehat.
Data yang beredar menunjukkan bahwa nilai kontrak hanya turun sekitar 1% dari Harga Perkiraan Sendiri (HPS) sebesar Rp 99,7 miliar. Dalam praktik pengadaan, selisih yang sangat tipis ini kerap menjadi indikator awal adanya tender yang tidak kompetitif atau bahkan diduga telah “diatur” sebelumnya.
Lebih serius lagi, muncul dugaan bahwa perusahaan pemenang tender tidak memenuhi syarat administrasi, khususnya terkait kewajiban BPJS bagi tenaga kerja. Jika dugaan ini benar, maka proses evaluasi oleh Kelompok Kerja (Pokja) pemilihan dapat dianggap melanggar prinsip dasar pengadaan sebagaimana diatur dalam Peraturan Presiden Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah.
Dalam perspektif hukum pidana, apabila terbukti terdapat persekongkolan dalam proses tender, maka hal ini dapat dijerat dengan Pasal 22 Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, yang melarang persekongkolan dalam penentuan pemenang tender.
Selain itu, jika terdapat unsur penyalahgunaan kewenangan oleh pejabat yang terlibat, maka potensi pelanggaran dapat merambah ke ranah tindak pidana korupsi. Pasal 3 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 jo. UU No 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi menyebutkan bahwa setiap orang yang menyalahgunakan kewenangan yang merugikan keuangan negara dapat dipidana.
Indikasi ini semakin menguat ketika melihat fakta bahwa dari belasan peserta tender, hanya satu perusahaan yang benar-benar mengajukan penawaran hingga tahap akhir. Kondisi ini menimbulkan pertanyaan mendasar: apakah proses tender berjalan secara sehat, atau hanya sekadar formalitas untuk melegitimasi pemenang yang telah ditentukan?
Jika terbukti bahwa proses tersebut direkayasa, maka praktik tersebut dapat dikategorikan sebagai persekongkolan tender horizontal maupun vertikal, yang tidak hanya melanggar hukum administrasi, tetapi juga berpotensi menjadi tindak pidana.
Di sisi lain, proyek Medan Islamic Centre bukan kali pertama menjadi sorotan. Pada tahap sebelumnya, proyek ini juga sempat dikaitkan dengan dugaan kejanggalan dalam pengadaan material, termasuk kasus tanah timbun yang disebut-sebut bernilai miliaran rupiah meskipun materialnya diduga diperoleh tanpa biaya.
Rangkaian peristiwa ini menunjukkan pola yang tidak bisa dianggap kebetulan. Ketika proyek bernilai besar terus diwarnai persoalan—mulai dari efisiensi anggaran, keselamatan kerja, hingga proses tender—maka publik memiliki alasan kuat untuk mempertanyakan integritas tata kelola proyek tersebut.
Dalam konteks pemerintahan, transparansi dan akuntabilitas bukan hanya prinsip, tetapi kewajiban. Kegagalan dalam menjamin kedua hal ini bukan hanya merugikan keuangan negara, tetapi juga dapat mengorbankan keselamatan manusia, sebagaimana yang terjadi dalam kasus ini.
Penting untuk ditegaskan bahwa hingga saat ini belum ada putusan hukum yang menyatakan adanya tindak pidana dalam proyek tersebut. Namun, akumulasi fakta dan dugaan yang berkembang telah memenuhi syarat sebagai indikasi awal (early warning) yang seharusnya segera ditindaklanjuti oleh aparat penegak hukum.
Jika tidak, maka risiko yang lebih besar akan muncul: normalisasi praktik-praktik menyimpang dalam proyek pemerintah, yang pada akhirnya merusak sistem pengadaan dan kepercayaan publik.
Kasus Medan Islamic Centre kini tidak lagi sekadar proyek pembangunan fisik. Ia telah berubah menjadi cermin dari bagaimana tata kelola anggaran publik dijalankan—apakah benar-benar untuk kepentingan rakyat, atau justru menjadi ruang bagi praktik-praktik yang menyimpang.
Pertanyaan yang kini mengemuka bukan lagi sekadar siapa yang salah, tetapi sejauh mana negara hadir untuk memastikan keadilan—baik bagi pekerja yang menjadi korban, maupun bagi publik yang berhak atas transparansi penggunaan uang negara.
Jika dugaan-dugaan ini terbukti, maka kasus ini berpotensi menjadi salah satu contoh nyata bagaimana kelalaian administratif, pelanggaran prosedur, dan dugaan penyimpangan dapat berkelindan dalam satu proyek besar. Dan seperti banyak kasus sebelumnya, semuanya seringkali baru terungkap setelah ada korban.
PENUTUP TAJAM
Kasus ini masih dalam tahap dugaan, namun satu hal sudah jelas:
ketika proyek bernilai ratusan miliar berjalan tanpa pengawasan ketat, maka yang dipertaruhkan bukan hanya uang negara—tetapi juga nyawa manusia.
Stands out for actually being useful instead of just being long, and a look at focusdefinesdirection kept that going, length without value is the default mode of most blogs these days but this site has clearly chosen a different path which I respect a lot as a reader who values careful editing decisions like that.
Bookmark added without hesitation after finishing, and a look at forwardenergyengine confirmed I should bookmark the homepage too rather than just this page, the rare site that earns category level trust rather than just single article approval is the kind I want to rely on across many different topics over time.
A piece that did not waste any of its substance on sales or promotion, and a look at forwardmotionengine continued that pure content focus, sites that resist the urge to monetise every paragraph are increasingly rare and this one has clearly made the editorial choice to keep the writing clean from commercial intrusion which I value highly.
Now appreciating that the post did not try to imitate any other style I might recognise, and a stop at forwardmotionframework continued that distinct voice, content with its own register rather than borrowed from elsewhere is content with real authorial presence and this site has clearly developed that presence through what feels like patient editorial work.
Skipped a meeting reminder to finish the post, and a stop at focusguidesmovement held me past another reminder, when content beats meetings the writer is doing something extraordinary because meetings have institutional support behind them and yet good writing can still occasionally win that competition for attention which I find heartening today.
Reading this in a moment of low energy still kept my attention, and a stop at ideasflowwithclarity continued that engagement under suboptimal conditions, content that survives the reader being tired is content with extra reserves of pull and this site has the kind of writing that holds up even when I am not at my reading best.
Honestly this was a good read, no jargon and no padding, and a short look at signalcreatesdirectionalflow kept that same feel going which I really appreciated, the writer clearly knows the topic well enough to explain it without hiding behind big words or filler that often gets used to seem clever.
Stayed longer than planned because each section earned the next, and a look at signalactivatesdirection kept that pulling effect going across more pages, the kind of subtle pull that good writing exerts on attention is something I find harder and harder to resist when I encounter it on the open web today.
Honestly impressed by how much useful content sits in such a small post, and a stop at clearbrick confirmed the rest of the site packs a similar punch, density without confusion is a hard balance to strike and this site has clearly cracked the code on it across many different topic areas covered.
Picked a single sentence from this post to remember, and a look at growthmoveswithpurpose gave me another to keep, content that produces memorable lines is doing more than just transferring information and the small selection of sentences I keep from each reading session is one of the actual returns I get from reading carefully.
Now feeling slightly more committed to my own careful reading practices having read this, and a stop at ideasneedmomentum reinforced that commitment, content that models the kind of attention it deserves is content that calibrates the reader and this site has clearly raised my own bar for what to bring to good writing today.
Came away with some new perspectives I had not considered before, and after growthmoveswithfocus those ideas felt more complete, the kind of content that stays with you a little while after reading rather than slipping out the moment you switch tabs and move on with your day to whatever comes next.
Decided to set a calendar reminder to revisit, and a stop at forwardthinkingengine extended that revisit list, calendar entries for content are a level of commitment I rarely make but when I do they signal a higher regard than a simple bookmark and this site has earned that calendar tier of relationship from me today.
Took the time to read every paragraph rather than skimming for the punchline, and a quick visit to signalpowersgrowth earned the same careful attention from me, that is the highest signal I can give about content quality because my default mode is rapid scanning rather than deliberate reading on most pages.
A piece that was confident enough to leave some questions open rather than forcing closure, and a look at clearcoast continued that intellectual honesty, content that admits the limits of its scope is more trustworthy than content that pretends to total understanding and this site has the right calibration on certainty consistently.
Reading the writers other posts after this one suggests the quality is consistent rather than peak, and a stop at claritycreatesmomentum confirmed the consistent quality reading, sites that hold the same level across many pieces rather than peaking on a few are sites with sustainable editorial discipline and this one has clearly developed that.
However many similar pages I have read this one taught me something new, and a stop at growthmovesintentionally added more new material, content that contributes genuinely fresh information rather than recycling what is already widely available is content with real informational value and this site is providing that informational freshness at a notable rate.
Reading this in a moment of low energy still kept my attention, and a stop at signalcreatesmomentum continued that engagement under suboptimal conditions, content that survives the reader being tired is content with extra reserves of pull and this site has the kind of writing that holds up even when I am not at my reading best.
Once I trust a site this much I tend to read everything they publish and that is the trajectory I am on with this one, and a stop at coilcolt confirmed the trajectory, the rare progression from interested reader to comprehensive reader is something only certain sites earn and this one is earning that progression rapidly.
Reading this prompted me to dig out an old reference book related to the topic, and a stop at signalclarifiesaction extended that connection to other sources, content that connects me back to my own existing knowledge rather than asking me to forget it is content with continuity and this site has that continuous quality.
I appreciate the clarity here, everything is explained in simple terms without unnecessary detail, and after a quick stop at directionsetsvelocity the points came together nicely for me, the writing keeps things straightforward and respects the reader from start to finish without ever talking down to anyone.
Refreshing to find writing that does not try to manipulate the reader into clicking onto the next page through cliffhangers and forced engagement, and a stop at progressmovespurposefully continued in the same respectful way, this is what reader first design actually looks like in practice rather than just in marketing copy that sounds nice.
The tone stayed consistent across the whole post which is harder than it looks for longer pieces, and a look at progressmovesbydesign continued the same voice, this kind of editorial consistency is a sign of either a single careful writer or a tightly run team and either is impressive today across the broader media environment.
Thanks for the breakdown, it gave me a clearer picture of something I had been confused about for a while now, and a stop at ideasunlockmotion closed the remaining gaps in my understanding nicely, no need to hunt around twenty other articles to put the pieces together which is a real time saver.
Felt like the writer was speaking directly to someone with my level of curiosity, neither talking down nor showing off, and a stop at signalturnsideasforward kept that comfortable matching going, finding writing that meets you where you are rather than asking you to climb up or stoop down feels great every time it happens.
Reading this between two meetings turned out to be the highlight of the morning, and a stop at compassbraid continued that highlight quality, content that outshines the structured parts of a working day is doing something well beyond ordinary and this site has produced multiple such highlights for me already this week alone.
If patience for careful reading is rare these days finding sites that reward it is rarer still, and a stop at ideasintomotion extended that rare reward, the diminishing returns on shallow content reading have made me more selective about where to spend reading time and this site is meeting the higher selectivity bar consistently.
During a reading session that included several other sources this one stood out, and a look at actionshapesdirection continued the standout quality, the side by side comparison of sources during research is a useful exercise and this site has been winning those comparisons for me consistently across multiple research sessions during the last week.
Liked the balance between depth and brevity, never too shallow and never too long, and a stop at forwardenergyreleased kept the same balance going across the rest of the site, this is one of the harder skills in writing and the team here clearly has it figured out very well indeed across every page.
Over the course of reading several posts here a pattern of quality has emerged, and a stop at compassbulb confirmed the pattern, the difference between sites that hit quality occasionally and sites that hit it consistently is huge and this site has clearly demonstrated the consistent kind through what I have read this morning.
Just want to flag that this was useful and not bury the appreciation in caveats, and a look at clarityshapesdirection earned the same direct praise, recognising good work without hedging it with criticism is something I try to practice because over qualified compliments tend to read as backhanded and miss the point sometimes.
Taking the time to read carefully here has been worthwhile for the past hour, and a look at signalcreatesalignment extended the worthwhile reading, the calculation of return on reading time spent is something I do informally and this site has been producing positive returns across multiple sessions during the last week of regular visits and reads.
Worth saying that the writing carries a particular kind of authority without making any explicit claims to it, and a stop at focuspowersprogress extended that earned authority feeling, sites that demonstrate expertise through the quality of their explanations rather than by stating credentials are sites I trust most and this site has it.
Now I want to find more sites like this but I suspect they are rare, and a look at directionpowersvelocity extended that thought, the few sites that meet this quality bar are precious specifically because they are rare and finding others like them is one of the ongoing projects of careful internet curation across the years.
Top quality material, deserves more attention than it probably gets, and a look at conchclove reflected the same effort across the site, a hidden gem in the modern web where most attention goes to whoever shouts loudest rather than whoever actually delivers the best content for their readers without much marketing fanfare.
Worth observing that the post landed without needing a flashy headline to hook attention, and a stop at growthflowsbychoice did the same, content that earns engagement through substance rather than packaging is the kind I trust more deeply and this site has clearly chosen substance as the primary lever for reader engagement throughout.
Looking for similar voices elsewhere has come up empty in my recent searches, and a stop at cotboil extended the search frustration, the rare site that does what no other does in quite the same way is precious and this one has clearly developed a particular approach that I have not been able to find duplicates of.
More substantial than most of what I find searching for this topic online, and a stop at cotchoice kept that quality consistent, this is one of those sites where the writing actually rewards careful reading rather than punishing the patient reader with empty filler stretched out across long paragraphs that say very little.
Stayed longer than planned because each section earned the next, and a look at cotcircle kept that pulling effect going across more pages, the kind of subtle pull that good writing exerts on attention is something I find harder and harder to resist when I encounter it on the open web today.
Worth saying that the post fit naturally into a rhythm of careful reading, and a stop at craftcanal extended the same rhythm, content that pairs well with how I actually read rather than demanding a different mode is content well calibrated to its likely audience and this site has clearly thought about that consistently.
Genuinely changed how I think about a small piece of the topic, which does not happen often online, and a look at cryptbeach added another nudge in the same direction, the kind of writing that earns a small mental shift rather than just confirming what you already thought before reading is a sign of careful thought.
Reading this confirmed that the topic deserves more careful attention than it usually gets, and a stop at cryptbuilt extended that elevated framing, content that raises the appropriate weight of a subject without being preachy about it is serving a quiet but important editorial function for the broader cultural conversation about it.
Reading this prompted a small note in my reference file, and a stop at cubeasana prompted another, the rare site that contributes useful nuggets to my own working knowledge rather than just consuming my attention is worth the time investment many times over compared to the usual pile of forgettable scroll content.
Liked how the writer used real examples instead of theoretical ones to make the points stick, and a stop at darechip added even more concrete examples, this is the kind of practical approach that respects readers who actually want to apply what they learn rather than just nodding along passively without doing anything useful.
Felt no urge to argue with the conclusions even though I started the post slightly skeptical, and a look at dewcarve maintained that pattern, writing that earns agreement through clarity of argument rather than rhetorical pressure is the kind I find most persuasive and the kind I want to read more of these days.
Worth a quiet moment of recognition for the consistency I have noticed across multiple posts, and a stop at dewchip continued that consistent quality, sites that maintain quality across many pieces rather than peaking on one viral post are sites with real editorial discipline and this one has clearly developed that discipline carefully.
Took a screenshot of one section to come back to later, and a stop at jalaxis prompted another saved tab, the urge to capture and revisit specific pieces of content is something I rarely feel but when I do it tells me the work is worth more than the average passing read for sure.
Worth marking this site as one to come back to deliberately rather than by accident, and a stop at lakepeach reinforced that intention, the difference between sites I find again by chance and sites I return to on purpose is meaningful and this one has clearly moved into the deliberate return category for me.
The clarity here is something I really appreciate, especially compared to sites that pile on jargon for no reason, and a look at lushmarble was the same, simple direct sentences that actually deliver information instead of dancing around the point for paragraphs at a time which wastes reader patience.
Honest opinion is that this is the kind of post that builds long term trust with readers, and a look at macrolush reinforced that perception, the slow accumulation of trust through consistent quality is the only sustainable way to build a real audience and this site is clearly playing that long game.